EK Archive

0

Bankrupt Kodak Finally Starts Killing Hopeless Businesses, Retains Doublespeak

Eastman (EKDKQ), in with its shares destined to be worthless, is finally starting to make the

English: This is a Kodak EasyShare LS743 digit...

moves that might have helped it avert this fate had failed CEO Antonio Perez undertaken them sooner. The company announced today that “it plans to phase out its dedicated capture devices business“.  Perhaps part of its failure lies in its insistence on using  obtuse language to describe its actions and products. Dedicated capture devices business?  Does McDonald’s speak of its “Animal derived protein-based human consumables business”?  Even the Postal Service doesn’t talk about cutting “physical object routing and transmittal personnel”.

With bankruptcy rumors swirling late last year, Kodak’s defenders were talking about imagined strength in Kodak’s digital camera business. With the company killing this business and saving $100 million per year by doing so, we now see that many of the rosy claims made about Kodak were not grounded in reality. One wonders why the company is continuing its struggling consumer printer business.

Long ago, the company split into a chemicals business and an imaging business. Its brand was once synonymous with photographs, though the cameras were often made by others. The company needs to return to these roots and pursue an asset-lite “Kodak-inside” business model, licensing its brand, intellectual property, and components for inclusion in others products.

Disclosure: The author holds no position in any stock mentioned

Enhanced by Zemanta

The post Bankrupt Kodak Finally Starts Killing Hopeless Businesses, Retains Doublespeak appeared first on Inelegant Investor.

0

Kodak Shares Worthless As Firm Finally Files Chapter 11

We’ve been warning for weeks that Eastman (EK) shares were too dangerous to own. Kodak finally made it

080809_Kodak_Tower_Top

official late last night and filed a voluntary business reorganization.  Citigroup will provide $950 million in debtor-in-possession financing. As we had stated, the company’s liabilities were to great, its ability to monetize intellectual and real property too slow, and its digital and other new operations not developing quickly enough to avoid this outcome.

We continue to believe that Kodak will emerge from the as a strong, but smaller company, having shed the liabilities that strangled it, having disposed of non-core assets, and having retained those parts of the company with the best prospects. It is important to note that current shareholders will not participate in this and that their shares are worth zero.  Inevitably in a bankruptcy, a robust market continues in the company’s shares despite the fact that there are very few cases when shares of bankrupt companies retain value(one recent example would be SYMS(SYMSQ)). This will not be an exception to the rule. Those who own Kodak ought to sell and salvage what they can, those who don’t should not buy. Our sympathy is with Kodak employees, vendors and partners during this difficult time.  We hope that the company’s reorganization and eventual emergence in 2013 will remove the clouds of uncertainty and create new growth and new opportunities.

Disclosure: The author owns shares in

Enhanced by Zemanta

Kodak Shares Worthless As Firm Finally Files Chapter 11 is a post from Inelegant Investor – Something of Value. All Rights Reserved.



0

Don’t Be Fooled By Eastman Kodak’s Dead Cat Bounce

(EK) surged 35% today, building on yesterday’s gains. Investors were reacting positively to two pieces of news released by the company.  On Tuesday morning the company announced it was restructuring from three reporting segments to two.

Under the new structure, Kodak has reduced its number of segments from three to two – the Commercial Segment and the Consumer Segment – which will both report into a newly created Chief Operating Office. The Chief Operating Office will be led by Philip Faraci, who will continue to serve as Kodak’s President and Chief Operating Officer and by Laura Quatela, who was recently named, alongside Faraci, as President and Chief Operating Officer of Kodak. Faraci will focus on the Commercial Segment and the company’s sales and regional operations, and Quatela will focus on the Consumer Segment and certain corporate functions. Both individuals will report to , Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, as will the positions of Chief Financial Officer, Chief Technical Officer, Chief Marketing Officer and General Counsel.

“As we complete Kodak’s transformation to a digital company, our future markets will be very different from our past, and we need to organize ourselves in keeping with that evolution,” Perez said. “This new structure simplifies the organization, focuses it more precisely on our consumer and commercial customers, and puts the right people in place to capitalize fully on the tremendous technological capabilities of Kodak. These business structure changes also allow us to allocate resources more productively, continue to significantly reduce administrative costs, and improve efficiency. We are confident that these changes will support our efforts to make the most of our opportunities.”

This led to a significant jump in the stock price, but it is unclear why.  The company has rearranged furniture, but ultimately not addressed the key problem which is that the company needs cash now. While this change may lead to cost savings and/or increased profitability, it certainly won’t do so in time to help the company with its current dire situation.

After the bell on Tuesday, the company released a second announcement.  In it, the company announced that it had filed patent infringement lawsuits against (AAPL) and .  The claims were similar to previous claims the company has made regarding infringement by phone and tablet devices of a series of ridiculously broad patents.  Interestingly, Kodak did not file any claims against Google(GOOG) or (MMI).  Kodak has been in discussions with all of these firms for sometime and been attempting to sell its patent portfolio.  This is a desperate, last-ditch attempt to force a settlement or purchase, but it is unlikely to result in any cash quickly enough to avoid . Despite this, shares were up 35% on Wednesday.

Mr. Market is in a manic mood and his bid this company up significantly in the last two days, but the common stock is still worth what it was before Tuesday’s open- nothing.

Disclosure: The author holds no position in any stock mentioned

 

Don’t Be Fooled By Eastman Kodak’s Dead Cat Bounce is a post from Inelegant Investor – Something of Value. All Rights Reserved.

0

Has The End Begun For Sears Holdings? CIT Stops Financing Sears Vendors

Holdings(SHLD) can’t seem to catch a break.  After weeks of falling, Sears stock rallied 8% today on no news.  Shareholders should cut their rejoicing short after tonight’s report from Bloomberg that (CIT) will no longer finance

2010 Sears logo

vendors for their sales to Sears. CIT would not confirm reports, but Sears spokeswoman Kimberly Freely confirmed the action in an email to Reuters

“We disagree with their (CIT’s) action, in fact we’d point out that other factors are approving shipments to and CIT’s payables represented less than 5 percent of inventories,” Freely said.

Freely explained that “at the end of December, Sears had about $4.2 billion of liquidity, including cash balances of about $0.9 billion” CIT’s action by itself should not threaten Sears future, but if other factors follow suit, the situation could quickly deteriorate.  Sears is in the midst of closing stores and increasing its cash position, and should be in a better situation later in the year, if it can continue to operate normally.  Ironically, , who controls a majority of Sears shares, also owns 2.9% of CIT, which lost 25% of its value in 2011.

We’ve written before that Sears needs to make major changes before its too late.  The company has continued to make important moves such as its recent hire of experienced merchandiser. Unlike Eastman Kodak(EK), the company has enough liquidity to turn things around, but time is rapidly running out.

Disclosure: The author owns shares in $

Has The End Begun For Sears Holdings? CIT Stops Financing Sears Vendors is a post from Inelegant Investor – Something of Value. All Rights Reserved.



0

A Model For Kodak To Emulate?

We’ve written extensively about the once-great Eastman ’s(EK) slide to bankruptcy, but what might be the result of a Kodak bankruptcy? What might Kodak, and the city of Rochester look like in 5 years.  Perhaps some answers can be found in the story of another prominent company synonymous with upstate New York city, , Ltd.  was recently the subject of a well-reported article at New York Times DealBook. There are certainly stark  differences between the issues Oneida faced and the issues Kodak faces.  Oneida did not face the disruption and obsolescence of its key products as Kodak has, but it faced its own set of challenges that were every bit as difficult.

What does Oneida look like today?

A third of Oneida’s roughly 450 employees still work at the company’s headquarters, a four-story granite building that stands across the street from the original house and doubles as a kind of living museum. Oneida advertisements from Life magazine and the Saturday Evening Post in the 1960s, some featuring then-spokesman Bob Hope, dot the walls of the office. A row of unused Kodak Carousels sits on a shelf outside the company’s in-house darkroom, long ago abandoned for a digital photography studio. Down the hall, a small group of model-makers hammers out prototypes by hand.

How did it get here?

Oneida’s financial problems were decidedly modern, and echoed the issues faced by companies in cities like Detroit and Pittsburgh. Starting in the 1990s, the company began to feel the heat of foreign competitors, who could produce utensils for a fraction of the price of American manufacturers. The attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, further hurt business, after the metal forks and knives Oneida supplied to airlines were banned on flights.

As its sales fell, Oneida hemorrhaged money — more than $157 million between January 2003 and October 2005 — and was forced to stop making flatware and close several facilities in Oneida and the surrounding cities, where the company had employed about 2,500 people at its peak. By 2006, the situation at the company, which in better times had been well-off enough to sponsor Little League teams, the golf course and other local activities, had become so dire that filing for was the only option.

“Oneida tried to hang onto its manufacturing facilities as long as it could,” said James E. Joseph, Oneida’s outgoing chief executive, who is stepping down this year as part of the Monomoy transition. “From a pure business standpoint, you could argue we hung on too long.”

A few months later, Oneida exited from bankruptcy, under the control of a group of hedge funds. Led by Monarch Alternative Capital, the firms moved swiftly — if painfully — to make the company profitable. They moved a distribution center to Savannah, Ga., to save on freight costs, closed stores and struck an agreement that allowed Robinson Home Products to distribute flatware and dinnerware under Oneida’s name. The hedge funds even debated moving Oneida’s headquarters closer to New York City to give it a better shot at attracting top talent, but eventually decided against it, according to several people involved in the discussions.

Those decisions stabilized Oneida. In five years, the firms reduced the company’s debt load to around $60 million from approximately $150 million. The company now turns a small annual profit of around $15 million before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, according to several people with knowledge of the company’s finances who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the numbers are private. Its North American flatware business gained 3 percentage points of market share last year, according to Mr. Joseph, and still has a valuable brand name.

If Kodak is to emerge from bankruptcy a healthy company, it, like Oneida before it, will have to dispense with sentimentality, find its new core competencies, and jettison everything else.  It’s the only way to keep the name of this iconic company alive and well for decades to come.

Disclosure: The author holds no position in any stock mentioned.

A Model For Kodak To Emulate? is a post from Inelegant Investor – Something of Value. All Rights Reserved.



0

Eastman Kodak Preparing Bankruptcy Filing- WSJ

Kudos to the for scooping the story that (EK) is preparing a bankruptcy filing and may file by month’s end.  The company is still exploring a patent sale to stave off , but it will be difficult to get adequate price in this distressed situation.  The company is said to be in negotiations for $1B in debtor-in-possession financing.  stock is down over 30% on the news- a stark reminder to those who have chastised us in recent days for picking on a beaten down stock that there is always more room to go down. Bankruptcy will wipe out shareholders, but will provide opportunity for the company to shed its liabilities and legacy costs, sell surplus assets in a controlled and organized way, and emerge with a profitable, but smaller operating business.  We believe the future for Kodak is bright, but current shareholders will not participate in its rebirth.

Disclosure: The author holds no position in

Eastman Kodak Preparing Bankruptcy Filing- WSJ is a post from Inelegant Investor – Something of Value. All Rights Reserved.



0

Eastman Kodak Delisting Notice a Non-Event

Lately, it seems like this blog is becoming all Eastman (EK) all the time.  Odd for a stock we don’t even own. Some Kodak bulls  have commented that we interpret every piece of Kodak news negatively, so we felt we should comment that today’s announcement that Kodak has received a continued listing standards notice from the is insignificant and should not factor into any appraisal of the company’s prospects.  There is nothing surprising about the notice; it merely states that the company’s average stock price has been below $1 for 30 consecutive trading days- something anyone with a calendar and internet access ought to have known.  It has no bearing and passes no judgement on the company’s prospects.

Kodak has 6 months to remedy the situation. By that point, either the stock will have rebounded above $1, or the company’s financial situation will be dire indeed.  We continue to think that is likely to file for this year- but this delisting notice has nothing to do with it.

Disclosure: The author holds no position in

Eastman Kodak Delisting Notice a Non-Event is a post from Inelegant Investor – Something of Value. All Rights Reserved.



0

Can Eastman Kodak’s Real Estate Save It?

A comment on a recent post asked whether we’d considered the value of Eastman ’s(EK) . It’s not something we’d given much thought to, but we’re friendly folk and so we proceeded to do a bit of digging.  Our first stop was Kodak’s most recent 10K. While some companies provide detail on their real estate holdings, Kodak provides a bare minimum. Kodak lists $1.037 billion in Property, Plant, and Equipment, $664 million in the United States, and $337 million abroad.  It’s reasonable to assume this long held property is held on Kodak’s books at a significant discount.  The most significant piece of real estate we were able to find is the 1200 acre Eastman Business Park in Rochester. The park has 300 greenfield acres resulting from the demolition of 44 buildings. There are still over 100 buildings remaining, and 14 have already been sold to other firms, including the largest, a 2.1 million square foot building sold for $11 million in 2008.

Kodak is also nearing a deal to sell some space to .  The college plans on spending $75 million to purchase and renovate the buildings.  Kodak’s real estate holdings are impressively large, and given the luxury of time the company could conceivably raise upwards of $2 billion by selling them, but it would be difficult to realize a fraction of that in the compressed time frame the company is working on. Similar to the patents, which I believe have been the subject of overly optimistic valuations, the real estate will take time to see its full value realized.  Any attempt to move the real estate quickly will result in lower sale prices. It’s possible that if the company can monetize some real estate and some intellectual property quickly, that can be staved off for the time being.  However, management will still be faced with a company bleeding money that they have not been able to staunch.

Please share any further information you have about Kodak’s real estate holdings so that we can continue to refine our valuation estimates.

Disclosure: The author holds no position in any stock mentioned.

Can Eastman Kodak’s Real Estate Save It? is a post from Inelegant Investor – Something of Value. All Rights Reserved.



0

Another Eastman Kodak Director Departs, Fleeing Sinking Ship

Laura Tyson, who had been a Director at Eastman Kodak(EK) since 1997, resigned on December 29, the company reported in a filing with the SEC.  Tyson is the third Kodak director to resign in the last week, and, as with the previous two, Kodak’s terse statement gave no reason or explanation.  We await the spin [...]

0

Response To Critic Of Our Eastman Kodak Post

Recently, we’ve taken a dim view of Eastman Kodak’s(EK) prospects.  As we wrote here and here, we believe the company is most likely past the point where a turnaround outside of bankruptcy is possible. A commenter assuming various names, most recently “Truthseeker”, has expressed his criticism in a most disdainful and discourteous manner.  While we [...]